Think Tank Photo Airport 4-Sight Mini Review

One of my main complaints against all photo bags is that they are too heavy. This tends to hold true with the high-quality bags in particular since the better made they are, the heavier they seem to get.

Enter the Think Tank Photo Airport 4-Sight. It’s unique in that it is the first camera bag (rolling type) with four wheels. This style of roller luggage has been around for a while, but I haven’t seen it deployed in a photo bag until now.

The entire point of the 4-Sight is to make it easier on the photographer to carry gear both through the innovation of a four-wheel roller and lighter materials.

The 4-Sight will hold a pro DSLR and four lenses with plenty of room for accessories. I have mine set up to hold two Olympus E-P3 bodies, with three lenses, a flash, accessories, memory cards, extra batteries and chargers and still have room to spare.

Like most modern camera bags, you can configure the bag any way you like. I like the fact that this particular bag comes with an organizer – a small removable bag that is perfect for most small photo accessories.

There is also a zippered top pocket that’s perfect for a press pass or airplane boarding pass. The bottom of the bag is doubly reinforced due to the design of the bag and it’s very strong. ThinkTank has gone so far as to build in user replaceable handles and wheels, although when used properly, I can’t see this being necessary.

I used the bag on my recent trip to Arizona to photograph hummingbirds and loved it. It’s so light weight that I can see myself getting two of these and reducing all my gear to just two, easy to roll bags.

Of course the 4-Sight comes with a built-in rain cover, those famous Think Tank high-quality zippers and all in a bag that weighs about eight pounds.

At just under $300 I still think that it’s a tad expensive (I think I’ve said that about every camera bag I’ve ever reviewed so it probably doesn’t matter) but otherwise, I’d say this bag is perfect for someone who needs to travel internationally or on small planes and who wants a rolling bag that doesn’t compromise on quality.

Fore more information visit http://www.thinktankphoto.com.

Highly recommended.

_______
This Post Sponsored by:
Viewbug - Fun Photo Contests
Kelby Training – Use code KTSBA12 to save $20
BorrowLenses.com – Renting Canon, Nikon, Olympus & Sony, bodies, lenses, etc.
SmugMug – Professional Photo Sharing
Digital SLR Store - Cameras, lenses, accessories and everything else.

Share

Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT Flash – Mini Review

Thanks to my pals at Borrowlenses.com – I got a chance to play witha a couple of the new Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT Flash units for a week. I used them in real world situations – photographing hummingbirds.

It’s the new flagship in the Canon line. At almost $600 it’s the most expensive flash Canon has ever sold.

I’ve used many Canon flashes but this one is easily the most sophisticated and powerful. The new features are designed to be more user-friendly, but if you’re a regular user of Canon’s other flashes, you’ll probably find the opposite is true. There are 18 custom functions and a bunch of menus via “soft buttons” that took me a couple of days to master.

It has all the usual features you’d expect from a top of the line flash. It’s powerful (GN 197′ (60 m) @ ISO100), well-built and versatile. It rotates a full 180 degrees and has focus assist. It’s got additional weather sealing and now zooms all the way to 200mm to match a 20-200mm zoom range.

There’s a new color filter holder (similar too Nikon’s SB-900) and you can use this flash as a controller. There is a new wireless controller built-in allowing you to use a multiple flash system that talks via radio wave communication for enhanced control of up to five groups of flashes. I tested this with a variety of Canon flashes – in fact five 580EXII flash units and two of the new 600s. Once I figured out how to do that – (it took a while) I have to say it was pretty slick. The new system works flawlessly once you learn how to use it.

I find the soft buttons confusing but I really like new brighter, high-density LCD on the back of the camera. It’s easier to read (partly because it is larger) than the old flash.

The main thing I like about this flash (other than its amazing power) is it’s ability to zoom from 20-200mm with a Canon lens and to do so automatically. This is quite an improvement over the 580EXII and if I were to buy the 600, that’s the main reason I would do so. The built-in radio control is also a big deal since it eliminates the need to buy third-party flash triggers.

Canon is also shipping a new wireless control head called the Canon ST-E3-RT although the old controller still works. The new one just adds a few features.

CONCLUSION

If you want to use Canon’s brilliant ETTL system, especially if you want to use multiple flashes and need maximum control, and you have the budget, this flash is for you. But at $600 you’re starting to get into the territory where you could buy remote studio strobes or hot lights or third-party flashes that offer more control and power. The 580EXII is a fine unit and if that is your current flash I see few reasons to upgrade unless money is just no object. So while I like the new Canon 600 flash unit, it’s complexity and price keep me from giving it my highest recommendation. Instead it gets the next highest – RECOMMENDED.

_______
This Post Sponsored by:
Viewbug - Fun Photo Contests
Kelby Training – Use code KTSBA12 to save $20
BorrowLenses.com – Renting Canon, Nikon, Olympus & Sony, bodies, lenses, etc.
SmugMug – Professional Photo Sharing
Digital SLR Store - Cameras, lenses, accessories and everything else.

Share

Airport International Rolling Camera Bag V 2.0 Review

When I was at WPPI in February, I ran into one of the founders of ThinkTank. If you’re a regular reader of this site then you already know that I am a big fan of the ThinkTank products. They are designed by working professional photographers – not marketers who think they know how to sell you something.

I used the original ThinkTank roller – the Airport Addicted for many years. The day I stopped using it – it looked like it was brand new even though it had flown around the world.

I switched out of that larger bag because as I’ve gotten older (and wiser) I’ve started carrying less gear. It’s easier on my back and frees me up to spend more time thinking about the vision and story in my images than the gear. It also helps with travel to destinations like Alaska which are typically served by smaller carriers with smaller overhead bins.


Enter the Think Tank ~ Airport International V 2.0. This is a bag that will fit on almost any plane, but will hold enough gear to get you through most shoots. It’s extremely well made and features all of ThinkTank’s usual great design sense along with top-flight zippers,

The wheels roll well (and are replaceable in case they break) and between the easy to use handle and the rolling capability, it’s a breeze to move this bag around.

The bag includes TSA-approved combination locks as well as a front and back cable lock.

You can configure this bag in an infinite number of ways. I use it to carry a Canon 5D MK III with 70-200mm f/2.8 IS “L” Version 2.0 lens attached, a Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 lens, a Canon 1.4 Teleconverter (MK III), a pack of polarizing filters, a Canon 600 EX-RT Speedlight, a Canon ST-E3-RT transmitter and loads of flash memory cards, card readers and assorted accessories.

The Think Tank Airport International Rolling Camera Bag Version 2.0 is a great solution for any photographer who wants to both transport and protect their gear. The only negative (and this is a very small nit) is that in order to be tough enough to protect your gear it also has to be heavy (and expensive.) Those small nits aside this is a very safe choice. If you can afford it, buy it. Highly recommended.

_______
This Post Sponsored by:
Viewbug - Fun Photo Contests
Kelby Training – Use code KTSBA12 to save $20
BorrowLenses.com – Renting Canon, Nikon, Olympus & Sony, bodies, lenses, etc.
SmugMug – Professional Photo Sharing
Digital SLR Store - Cameras, lenses, accessories and everything else.

Share

NAB 2012 – From A Photographer’s Point Of View

NAB is history. The show was well-attended and even though most of you are still photographers, there was plenty to look at for the average stills person. That said, video on DSLRs is here to stay and just as there were photographers who predicted film would beat digital, there are those with their heads still in the sand about this. But it’s an undeniable fact that half of you have shot at least SOME video on a DSLR and from that perspective, NAB is hoping.

From the Canon booth everything was on display – including the new 1DX. The video capabilities of each new Canon camera was the focus of the Canon booth. Similarly, Nikon was showing off video from the new D800 and D4. Canon seemed to have a bigger video focus.

There were plenty of lighting and grip companies displaying their wares. We shot some videos on the floor (including the one with Chuck Westfall – which posted yesterday) and others which will appear here soon.

The main take away for me was that the video capabilities of DSLRs are improving to the point that truly professional work can be shot using one of these cameras. And the resulting accessories are there to be enjoyed. The other thing to note is that this video is of a higher quality than was available at any price 10 years ago. That is a staggering thought.

As for accessories:

From steadycams to tripods to lights to grip – it was all on the floor. There were exhibitors from all over the world and I probably saw more iPads in one place than anywhere before. People were using iPads as camera monitors or controllers. I even saw a cool iPad app that lets you use your iPad as a teleprompter.

It’s amazing to see how fast this market is growing and the quality of the gear is improving while the costs are generally going down.

The classroom sessions were well-attended and Adobe stole the show with CS6 and all of its integrated video features.

I’ve been to many NAB shows. I’ve seen it more crowded than it is this year but never so enthusiastic.

_______
This Post Sponsored by:
Viewbug - Fun Photo Contests
Kelby Training – Use code KTSBA12 to save $20
BorrowLenses.com – Renting Canon, Nikon, Olympus & Sony, bodies, lenses, etc.
SmugMug – Professional Photo Sharing
Digital SLR Store - Cameras, lenses, accessories and everything else.

Share

Nikon D800 Mini – Mini Review

This will be a very short review, because for me the D800 is a very confusing camera. I realize that my review will be very polarizing and controversial. If I don’t heap praise on this camera the Nikon fanboys will revolt. But I call em’ like I see em’ so here goes nothing.

I’ve had a short time to shoot with and test the Nikon D800. Let me say right off the bat it’s a fine camera. So if you just want one regardless of what I say then buy one. But here’s the thing. That said…

The D800 is a camera that seems to be at odds with itself. On the one hand, there’s tons of detail – which you’d expect at 36mp. But the low-light performance at high ISO suffers – period. There is a bit more dynamic range in the D800 than the 5D MK III, but there’s not enough difference to really tell the difference.

If you’re shooting for detail in large prints, the D800 does offer a bit more detail in the high ISOs. If you’re one of the few hundred photographers in the world shooting for billboards – this is your camera. If you want a little cleaner image, the Canon 5D MK III wins in my opinion.

There’s really nothing wrong with the D800 – it is solid, well-built and feels good in the hand. I can’t be sure but it feels like the battery doesn’t last quite as long as the one on my D700. The camera produces a nice, sharp image that has good colors. But remember – this is a 36mp camera. If you plan on buying one, you better also plan on buying more and larger hard drives, a faster computer and more and larger memory cards. The files coming off the camera are at least 40 megabytes. Do the math! If you are used to shooting a D700, that means you’ll need three times the hard drive space and three times the camera memory. Add that to the cost of the camera and it’s not quite the bargain it appears to be compared with the 5D MK III. Also – get used to going for coffee while your images import.

The Nikon D800 also has a few small problems. Its autofocus doesn’t work as expected. It seems to do an initial grab and then fine tune. The AF on the D800 is in my opinion, inferior to the AF on the 5DMKIII. That said, if you’re shooting in very low light, you might want to look at the advantage the D800 offers which is a focus assist lamp. This isn’t available on the 5D MK III – although a flashlight will do the trick. The other problem I experienced relates to the camera simply locking up. The only way to fix it is to take the battery out. I don’t know if I have a bad copy or it’s a random problem, but I assume it’s something that can be fixed with a firmware update if it’s widespread.

Video on the D800 is a step up from the D700. As with the D4, Nikon has done a great job of bringing video to the camera. I think it’s safe to say that Nikon and Canon are almost at parity now when it comes to video. For some of you this won’t matter but for me and many others, it’s a big deal. If you’ve been buying Canon to shoot video but wish you could buy Nikon I think it’s safe to say you can get the job done with Nikon.

I am not going to write much about this camera because as I originally expected, it just doesn’t make sense to me. I have a sort of “meh” reaction to it. I am particularly disappointed in its autofocus system compared to that found on the 5D MK III – but it is $500 cheaper than the Canon so if you’re deciding between the two that’s a big factor – UNTIL you also consider the cost of more computer memory, a faster computer and bigger camera memory cards. Then it’s a wash.

I wish Nikon had stuck with the original sensor – fixed the AF and then done the rest of the upgrade. At that point I think they would have had a nearly perfect camera. In the end, they have a camera that will help those of you who make big prints find all the detail you will need. But how many of you REALLY make big, and I mean big prints that often? I don’t see it as a reason to switch to Nikon if you’re a Canon shooter.

I like the camera but I won’t use one in my day-to-day work. I prefer the 5D MK III for the faster frame rate and much better AF.

Nevertheless, at $3000 for a camera that offers very nice images full of detail, it is still recommended.

_______
This Post Sponsored by:
Viewbug - Fun Photo Contests
Kelby Training – Use code KTSBA12 to save $20
BorrowLenses.com – Renting Canon, Nikon, Olympus & Sony, bodies, lenses, etc.
SmugMug – Professional Photo Sharing
Digital SLR Store - Cameras, lenses, accessories and everything else.

Share

Nikon D800 Mini – Mini Review

This will be a very short review, because for me the D800 is a very confusing camera. I realize that my review will be very polarizing and controversial. If I don’t heap praise on this camera the Nikon fanboys will revolt. But I call em’ like I see em’ so here goes nothing.

I’ve had a short time to shoot with and test the Nikon D800. Let me say right off the bat it’s a fine camera. So if you just want one regardless of what I say then buy one. But here’s the thing. That said…

The D800 is a camera that seems to be at odds with itself. On the one hand, there’s tons of detail – which you’d expect at 36mp. But the low-light performance at high ISO suffers – period. There is a bit more dynamic range in the D800 than the 5D MK III, but there’s not enough difference to really tell the difference.

If you’re shooting for detail in large prints, the D800 does offer a bit more detail in the high ISOs. If you’re one of the few hundred photographers in the world shooting for billboards – this is your camera. If you want a little cleaner image, the Canon 5D MK III wins in my opinion.

There’s really nothing wrong with the D800 – it is solid, well-built and feels good in the hand. I can’t be sure but it feels like the battery doesn’t last quite as long as the one on my D700. The camera produces a nice, sharp image that has good colors. But remember – this is a 36mp camera. If you plan on buying one, you better also plan on buying more and larger hard drives, a faster computer and more and larger memory cards. The files coming off the camera are at least 40 megabytes. Do the math! If you are used to shooting a D700, that means you’ll need three times the hard drive space and three times the camera memory. Add that to the cost of the camera and it’s not quite the bargain it appears to be compared with the 5D MK III. Also – get used to going for coffee while your images import.

The Nikon D800 also has a few small problems. Its autofocus doesn’t work as expected. It seems to do an initial grab and then fine tune. The AF on the D800 is in my opinion, inferior to the AF on the 5DMKIII. That said, if you’re shooting in very low light, you might want to look at the advantage the D800 offers which is a focus assist lamp. This isn’t available on the 5D MK III – although a flashlight will do the trick. The other problem I experienced relates to the camera simply locking up. The only way to fix it is to take the battery out. I don’t know if I have a bad copy or it’s a random problem, but I assume it’s something that can be fixed with a firmware update if it’s widespread.

Video on the D800 is a step up from the D700. As with the D4, Nikon has done a great job of bringing video to the camera. I think it’s safe to say that Nikon and Canon are almost at parity now when it comes to video. For some of you this won’t matter but for me and many others, it’s a big deal. If you’ve been buying Canon to shoot video but wish you could buy Nikon I think it’s safe to say you can get the job done with Nikon.

I am not going to write much about this camera because as I originally expected, it just doesn’t make sense to me. I have a sort of “meh” reaction to it. I am particularly disappointed in its autofocus system compared to that found on the 5D MK III – but it is $500 cheaper than the Canon so if you’re deciding between the two that’s a big factor – UNTIL you also consider the cost of more computer memory, a faster computer and bigger camera memory cards. Then it’s a wash.

I wish Nikon had stuck with the original sensor – fixed the AF and then done the rest of the upgrade. At that point I think they would have had a nearly perfect camera. In the end, they have a camera that will help those of you who make big prints find all the detail you will need. But how many of you REALLY make big, and I mean big prints that often? I don’t see it as a reason to switch to Nikon if you’re a Canon shooter.

I like the camera but I won’t use one in my day-to-day work. I prefer the 5D MK III for the faster frame rate and much better AF.

Nevertheless, at $3000 for a camera that offers very nice images full of detail, it is still recommended.

_______
This Post Sponsored by:
Viewbug - Fun Photo Contests
Kelby Training – Use code KTSBA12 to save $20
BorrowLenses.com – Renting Canon, Nikon, Olympus & Sony, bodies, lenses, etc.
SmugMug – Professional Photo Sharing
Digital SLR Store - Cameras, lenses, accessories and everything else.

Share

What Camera Should I Buy? UPDATED VERSION – April 2012

PUBLISHER’S NOTE: This post is an updated compilation of several shorter posts I wrote in the past trying to answer the question, “What camera should I buy?”

It’s still the most popular question I am asked. “What camera should I buy?” Lately there’s a new twist to the question…”Is this brand camera better than that brand camera?”

No matter how hard I try to tell people that there’s no perfect answer, they keep asking. So since I can’t convince anyone otherwise, at least know the answers to THESE questions before you ask me YOUR question.

1 ) What subject(s) will you photograph most often? Weddings, portraits, wildlife, sports, landscapes, still lifes, food, fashion, etc.
2 ) What gear (if any) do you now own?
3 ) If you had to choose between ease of use and power, which would you select?
4 ) Do you want a compact pocket-sized camera (point and shoot) or a DSLR?
5 ) On a scale of 1-10 (10 being a working pro and 1 being someone who usually shoots with a disposable camera) how would you rate your skill?
6 ) What is the MOST money you’d be willing to spend on a camera?
7 ) How long do you think you might keep the camera?
8 ) What do your friends use?
9 ) Do you have a local camera store that can offer you support?

If you have thought carefully about these questions and have the answers – you should then be closer to knowing what the perfect camera for you might be.

Hopefully, your interest in photography is strong enough that you’ll read this entire article. That will give you the best chance of making the right decision. If you’re just not that interested, scroll all the way to the bottom to see some of the popular cameras that I recommend.

For those who stuck with me:

I know that beginners especially want this question answered. They are more likely to think that it’s the camera that takes the picture, not the photographer. Unfortunately for them, that’s not the case. And there’s no secret, magic or special camera that will make you into Ansel Adams.

Let’s start with goals. What goals do you have with your photography? Photographing the kids is much easier and less expensive than photographing wildlife. Making studio portraits will require a different kind of camera than that used by sports photographers. Do you want to turn pro or just make pictures you’ll share with your immediate family? Understand this simple truth: There is no perfect camera. And not all cameras are designed for all types of photography. Many photographers have more than one camera, depending on how many photographic pursuits they are engaged in at one time.

You’ll need to take into account a wide variety of factors when selecting a camera, and the first is budget.

This post continues below….

Good equipment can sure make it easier to capture great shots, but you do not have to be Bill Gates to afford good quality equipment. Depending on the kind of photos you want to make, and how accessible your intended subjects are, you should be able to get a good camera outfit for less than $500-$600. But if you want to specialize if wildlife or sports photography, that budget will increase. If you want to specialize in food, medical, aerial, high fashion, again – the budget will increase.

Regardless of budget, you’ll need to start with some basics. And I am making some assumptions here. I am assuming you are looking for a digital camera. Few film cameras are sold these days. And the focus of Photofocus.com is digital photography, so I am not going to cover film. If you’re the kind of person who doesn’t know what kind of camera you want, a film camera is the wrong choice almost all of the time. (You film purists out there flame away, because I’ll just ignore you.)

Now if you are serious about producing quality photography, you’ll need to invest in a 35mm single-lens reflex camera with at least one lens. Commonly referred to as DSLRs, these cameras offer speed, choice, and control. The convenience of smaller format SLRs, combined with their ability to work with affordable lenses, make 35mm SLRs the a good starting point for most types of photography. (There is one exception to this rule. The newer 4/3 Micro format cameras like the Olympus E-P2 aren’t technically DSLRs. They don’t allow you to look directly through the lens. They have larger sensors than most point and shoot cameras but smaller sensors than most DSLRs. There may be some professionals who could get buy with a micro 4/3 camera system.)

Point-and-shoot cameras USUALLY don’t deliver enough control or digital data to deliver professional quality photos. You can get some decent images with the higher-end digital point-and-shoot cameras, and as time goes by, you’ll see more published images come from these cameras, but generally, they don’t have sufficient focal length, dynamic range, response or image quality. Another problem with point-and-shoot cameras is that they are often too slow for some types of photography.

Therefore, I highly recommend 35mm format DSLR. Medium and large format cameras are also an option, but not a practical one for most due to their cost, size and learning curve. Digital 35mm cameras offer a wider range of lenses, are usually less expensive, easier to carry, easier and faster to operate, and provide the most flexibility to photograph a wide range of subjects.

Why DSLR over Point-And-Shoot?

Shutter lag is the interminable span of time between the moment you trigger the shutter and the moment the camera actually captures the image. You won’t face this problem on a high-end SLR but point-and-shoot cameras are commonly slow. If your goal is to capture spur of the moment and candid opportunities, you’ll have far greater success with the SLR. This is especially important in wildlife, sports, baby and some other forms of photography. It’s impossible to calculate the number of times I’ve waited for a subject to move just a few inches this way or that. Having access to instant response in the shutter release is absolutely essential in such cases.

TTL or through the lens is the term used to describe what happens when you look through the viewfinder of an SLR. You’ll see the actual composition recorded on the sensor. With point-and-shoot film cameras (most digitals have an LCD view screen), you’re usually looking through a viewfinder and not through the lens itself. This factor can introduce something called parallax error, a visual distortion resulting from the difference in apparent direction of an object as seen from two different points. In other words, you’ll photograph a slightly different picture than what you saw through the viewfinder. Parallax error increases as distance to your subject decreases. This makes photographing close-ups without TTL problematic. While many newer cameras use “live view” to show you what the lens sees on the camera’s LCD, this is hard for some people to get used to, so TTL is the best choice.

Lenses – With SLR cameras, you have a wider range of lenses available. Whether you need a macro lens for close-ups or long telephoto lens to pull in wildlife, you’ll be able to attach one to your SLR body. This is something you can’t do with a point-and-shoot camera. Yes, there are macro attachments and digital zoom available on point-and-shoot cameras, but they are almost always for appearance sake and are quality compromises due to low-quality optics.

F/stops – By using a variety of interchangeable lenses, you’ll have a wider range of available f/stops to work with, giving you greater creative control with depth of field.

Shutter Speeds – SLR bodies also offer a wider range of shutter speeds, often from 30 seconds to 1/8000 of a second, as well as bulb setting. A wide range of shutter speed settings is a requirement for good general photography. Most point-and-shoots have a very limited shutter speed.

Metering – SLR bodies have more sophisticated metering systems. They also give you the choice between different metering patterns such as matrix metering, spot metering, and center-weighted metering. Many even permit you to shift the point of focus.

Auto focus – SLR bodies will give you faster auto focus. This is especially useful if you want to include fast-moving subjects in your photography. Most point-and-shoot cameras won’t permit manual focusing, something that is essential for landscape and close-up photography.

Filters – Lenses on many P/S cameras don’t allow for the use of filters. At a minimum, you’ll need to be able to attach a polarizing filter.

Flash – A modern SLR camera body gives you much greater creative control when using flash. You’ll be able to use more than one flash, and you’ll have other creative controls, such as rear-curtain sync and repeating flash.

Depth of Field Preview Button – A main reason I recommend the SLR camera over a point-and-shoot camera is the depth-of-field preview button. The DOF preview button shows the effect of your chosen f/stop on your image. You see what the film or sensor will see. This way you can fine-tune your image before pressing the shutter and avoid unpleasant surprises in the final image. I don’t know of any point-and-shoot camera that features a depth-of-field preview button, but most midrange to pro-level SLRs offer one. If you’re serious about any sort of outdoor or nature photography, I don’t recommend buying a camera without this feature.

All that said, there are some very good compact cameras out there. And while they will not deliver the image quality or flexibility of even an inexpensive DSLR, they can make great – even salable images.

Assuming you want a DSLR, here are some specific features to look for in a digital SLR camera body.

*Depth of Field Preview button. In my opinion, this is essential but Live View may make this less important.

*High ISO noise reduction.

*Full range of shutter speeds, from 30 seconds and bulb to at least 1/2000 second.

*Spot meter capability.

*Full range of exposure mode options, including manual, aperture priority, and shutter priority.

*Continuous auto focus and focus tracking.

*Capability of using a cable release. This reduces photographer-induced vibrations.

*Multiple focus and spot meter points.

*Motor drive. Most new cameras can achieve at least three frames per second.

*Custom function capabilities that allow you to configure the camera for the way you like to work.

*Built-in or add-on vertical grip with shutter release. This feature makes holding the camera in vertical orientation much more comfortable and makes working in the vertical orientation easier and more efficient, particularly for photographers with bigger hands.

*The camera body feels right. This is very subjective. You should hold the camera in your hand and decide if you like the way it fits.

What haven’t I talked about? Sensor size for one. Most cameras costing $500 or more have very high-quality sensors that deliver more than enough information to make large prints. Do note that simply having more megapixels doesn’t mean better image quality. You want the physically largest sensor you can afford, not the one with the most pixels crammed on it. This is why even cheap DSLRs tend to deliver better picture quality than compact cameras. The sensors in the DSLR are physically larger than the sensor in the compact camera.

I haven’t talked about battery life, since most modern cameras have batteries that last a long time. I haven’t covered other technical or specialty features because frankly, if you’re reading this with interest, it’s probably because you’re new at this. That means you should stick with the basics for now. Later on, you’ll know what to look for when the time comes to upgrade.

Should you buy Canon or Nikon? Olympus or Pentax? Any current, brand-name camera system on the market today will give you good results. Some things to take into consideration when choosing a brand are availability of lenses. Someday, you may want to add to your collection. Also consider things like image stabilization, ruggedness, custom features, and how easy it is to use.

What are your friends using? If many of your friends are using Canon, and you buy Canon, you’ll have a ready-made “technical support” group (as well as sources for borrowing lenses.) Likewise, if all your friends are using Nikon, buy Nikon for the same reasons.

One point here to consider. When it comes to DSLRs, Nikon and Canon together have more than 90% of the market. That means it’s probably going to be easier to find accessories, educational materials, support, etc., when using these brands.

There are lots of choices out there. If you stick with big brands that offer large lens lines, you’ll be fine. Don’t agonize over this decision. Remember, you can’t go to the store where Stephen King buys his pens, and expect to write great novels. You can’t go to the art supply store where Van Gogh bought his paints and brushes and expect to make great paintings. And you can’t expect to buy cameras with secret powers either.

Photography is about having a vision, a good eye, passion for the subject, great light, access, storytelling and heart. The camera equipment is just a tool designed to help capture the rest. I don’t know a single professional photographer who’s ever told me an editor refused to buy an image because the photographer used the wrong camera. It’s your eye, your vision, your ability to tell a story with the camera and your desire that matter most.

Now just go out and buy the camera, whichever one it is, and start shooting. Good luck.

If you just want to know what cameras I like, here’s the list.

EDITOR’S NOTE: I am not saying these are the only cameras I like, or that other cameras aren’t good. I am saying that based on price and performance, these are MY safe picks in each category. I own almost all these cameras. I have no bias against or for any of these companies since I own and use so many different brands. None of these companies sponsor me here or anywhere else. Ignore brand loyalty debates. Just pick the one that seems to fit your needs.

Compact And Pocket Cameras

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 10MP Digital Camera with 12x Wide Angle MEGA Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7 inch LCD (Black)

Olympus PEN E-P3
Olympus PEN E-P3 With Electronic Viewfinder

Nikon Coolpix P7100
Nikon COOLPIX P7100

Super Budget DSLR

Nikon D3100 Body Only
Nikon D3100

Budget DSLR

Canon EOS Rebel T3i Body Only
Canon EOS Rebel T3i

Nikon D7000 Body Only
Nikon D7000

Prosumer

Nikon D300s
Nikon D300s 12MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera (Body Only)

Canon 7D
Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-inch LCD (Body Only)

Pro

Nikon D700
Nikon D700 12.1MP FX-Format CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only)

Canon 5D MK III
Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Canon 1D MK IV
Canon EOS 1D Mark IV 16.1 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-Inch LCD and 1080p HD Video (Body Only)

Nikon D3s
Nikon D3S 12.1 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-Inch LCD and 24fps 720p HD Video Capability (Body Only)

Leica M9
Leica M9

NOTE: I realize this will be controversial but I am sticking with the Nikon D3s over the D4 and the Nikon D700 over the 800. I don’t think the D4/D800 warrant spending money on the upgrade. I’d wait for the D900 and/or the D4s/5. Also note, the Canon 1DX is delayed and has not been considered for this list.

_______________
This post sponsored by the Digital SLR Store

Share

Photographers: Stay Warm When Photographing in Winter – Kodiak Seiner Jacket Mini-Review

When I started packing for my trip to Alaska I remembered that I had no winter coat. After moving from Seattle to Vegas, I donated the old winter coat to the Salvation Army since it was a bit long in the tooth and I wasn’t sure I would ever need such a coat again.

Then my most recent trip to Alaska had me re-thinking that strategy. Since I had no coat I decided to wait until I arrived in Alaska to buy one. To get by I had five layers in the mean time – an undershirt, long-sleeve fishing shirt, sweater, hoodie and outside rain layer. This actually worked better than I thought it would on all but the coldest days, but it was a hassle to get all that stuff on. So when we came into town for lunch one day I stopped at NOMAR. It’s a great outdoor/outfitter type store. All the clothing they sell is made right there in the store. And they do their work with pride. I was treated to demonstrations of how their clothing is made and how it works.

I decided on the Kodiak Seiner Jacket - their best – as my new winter coat. This puppy has everything. It features Polartec Windbloc® which actually works – it kept the cold, strong, Alaska wind from getting through to my spoiled by Las Vegas weather skin. This jacket also has a waterproof, abrasion resistant STORM-TECH® nylon that blows my mind. 

When I was in the store, the salesman took a big bottle of water and poured it all over the jacket I was about to buy. The water beaded right up. It was amazing. And out in the field, on the boat, surging against the three foot seas there was nothing to worry about. Any water that hit me bounced off. It’s like Kryptonite for water!

The zippers are the best I’ve seen. There’s a hood, vented pits, hidden inside pockets and the jacket even folds up on itself so that it can be zipped into a back pocket and turned into a pillow.

I bought a black jacket but it also comes in blue and red, and in sizes from x-small to XX-L. The XX-L is almost too big for me – that’s something I rarely say – so if you’re a large person, don’t fret…this jacket will probably fit you.

This jacket blocks 100% of the wind and almost 100% of the water it encounters. It’s lightweight and easy to move around in but very effective. I am glad I bought it. At $335 it’s a bit on the expensive side but you get what you pay for.

If you have a winter photography trip in your future I can highly recommend the Kodiak Seiner Jacket. Stay warm and dry and concentrate on your photography, not how uncomfortable you are.

_______
This Post Sponsored by:
Viewbug - Fun Photo Contests
Kelby Training – Use code KTSBA12 to save $20
BorrowLenses.com – Renting Canon, Nikon, Olympus & Sony, bodies, lenses, etc.
SmugMug – Professional Photo Sharing
Digital SLR Store - Cameras, lenses, accessories and everything else.

Share

Cokin’s Graduated ND filters – A Product Review

Hey guys!

Benjamin Von Wong – Montreal Based photographer here! I recently reviewed for you a set of teleconverters, and this time wanted to follow up with a set of Graduated ND filters from Cokin supplied to me during my trip to Africa by the nice fellows over at B&H!

Cokin's Graduated ND filters - A Product Review

As you may probably know, a graduated ND filter is essentially a square plate of glass that darkens the image gradually from top to bottom. What’s fun about the filter set from Cokin is that it comes with various “densities” of darkness that are stackable. What this means is that you have a pretty good control over how big of a change in dark-light transitions that you can do. Additionally, since the filter rests on a ring, you can rotate the filters to manually control the angle of the gradient!

Tamron

read more

Share